"The process for district accreditation helps focus school systems on a continuous process of improvement, providing external checks, support, and feedback to help school systems continuously improve."
In addition, accredited school systems pay accreditation fees that are used to provide accredited schools and school systems with research-based standards, nationally-trained quality assurance review team chairs, high-quality resources and tools, and ongoing professional development. The annual dues for the school system are based on the number of schools under the jurisdiction of the school system. Additionally, the school system is responsible for a District Accreditation Quality Assurance Review Visit fee assessed once every five years to offset the costs associated with conducting the Quality Assurance Review.
Term Accreditation
The accreditation process is based on a five-year term accreditation. The process helps focus school systems on a continuous process of improvement, providing external checks, support, and feedback to help school systems continuously improve. The following chart outlines the process over the five-year term.
The AdvancED Accreditation Standards for Quality School Systems serve as the foundation for the accreditation process. The seven standards and accompanying indicators are tied directly to the research on factors that impact student learning. The seven standards address the following areas:
Accredited school systems adhere to the standards and use them as a tool for ongoing self-assessment. They use the standards to continually ask themselves, "What more can we be doing to benefit our students?"
Accredited school systems use a disciplined and system-wide approach to document and maintain evidence of their adherence to the standards. They are continually ready to answer the question, "How do we know we meet the standards?"
The Quality Assurance Review
Purpose. Once every five years, the school system hosts a Quality Assurance Review team. The purpose of the Quality Assurance Review is to:
Preparation. To prepare for the review, the school system completes the Standards Assessment Report between six weeks and six months prior to the scheduled review. The report engages the school system, its schools, and community in an in-depth self assessment of each of the seven AdvancED standards. It helps the school system identify areas of strength and opportunities for improvement and provides the review team with a starting point for their work.
Overall Assessment Rubrics (Word)The school system then gathers documentation to provide evidence and demonstrate adherence to the standards. The aim is to minimize additional paperwork for the school system and allow the school system to use existing materials and artifacts to assure the review team that it has met the standards. The Examples of Evidence resource helps district personnel consider the range of artifacts and other evidence available in their district that demonstrate the district's adherence to the AdvancED quality standards. The Essential Artifacts identifies those artifacts that the district needs to make available to the Quality Assurance Review team (either in hard copy or electronic form).
Essential Artifacts (Word)The school system works with the Quality Assurance Review team chair to define the schedule for the review team and ensure that the travel and accommodation needs of team members are met.
The Team. The Quality Assurance Review team is led by an AdvancED trained and certified team chair who is appointed to the school system by AdvancED. Team members are selected for the team by AdvancED with input and discussion from the team chair to ensure that team members reflect areas of need/focus for the school system. The size of the team varies depending on the size of the school system (number of schools), with teams ranging from 6 to 15 members for school systems with less than 50 schools. School systems in excess of 50 schools will have teams ranging from 18 to 36 members.
Length of Visit. The review is scheduled by AdvancED and encompasses three days on site, with the team arriving the day before the visit for an Orientation Session conducted by the team chair.
The Review. While on site, the Quality Assurance Review Team provides an orientation, conducts interviews with representatives of the school system, its schools and community, including the superintendent and all members of the governing board, visits schools and classrooms, collects and reviews evidence, and meets to review findings. The team provides an oral exit report to the school system at a called public meeting of the governing board at the conclusion of the visit, highlighting commendations, opportunities for improvement, and recommendations for action. The team also recommends an accreditation status for the school system.
The Report. Following the visit, the chair with input from the review team completes the Quality Assurance Review Report and submits it to a nationally-trained reader who reviews the report to ensure it is well written, is of high quality, and contains targeted recommendations that will enhance the school system's capacity to improve system and school effectiveness and student performance. The school system then receives the final report and uses the recommendations in the report to guide improvement efforts.
Continuous Improvement
Accredited school systems and their schools are committed to being better today than they were yesterday. This commitment to continuous improvement is demonstrated by the school system and its schools' adherence to the standards and implementation of a quality improvement process that yields results for students.
Flexibility in Choice of Process. School systems and their schools may use the improvement process of their choice that meets the requirements of the AdvancED standards. This may include the AdvancED Breakthrough School Improvement Series, the use of the state's improvement model, or any number of improvement processes that school systems have found to be effective in enhancing organizational effectiveness and student performance.
Efficacy of Process. The Quality Assurance Review team examines the quality of the implementation of the process and looks for evidence of the effectiveness of the chosen improvement process. The team offers guidance and support on ways to enhance the school system's continuous improvement efforts.
Two Year Progress Report. Two years following the Quality Assurance Review team visit, the school system submits a progress report detailing the actions and progress the school system has made on the team's recommendation. The progress report is intended to serve as a tool for school systems to stay focused on the recommendations of the team and to use the team report as a guide to enhancing their improvement efforts. The report is also used as a monitoring tool by AdvancED to provide assistance to the school system and to ensure that the school system is maintaining the expectations for accreditation.
The Accreditation Decision
AdvancED national office receives the Quality Assurance Review Team Report. The office works with the AdvancED Accreditation Commission, a national commission comprised of practitioners to review the team's accreditation recommendation and other evidence to determine an accreditation status for the school system. The Two-Year Progress Report and other documentation gathered over the course of the school system's accreditation term are reviewed on an ongoing basis by the AdvancED Accreditation Commission to ensure continued adherence to the standards.
Making Excellence a Habit
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit."
|